Public comment
Submit a comment on the draft standard.
How to comment
Email comments@computestewardship.com. Reference the section or item number (for example, E1 or C3). Say who you are and whether you are commenting for an organization. Redlines of the PDF are welcome. If you want your comment logged without your name, say so.
What we most want challenged
Section 10 of the draft lists seven open questions: the 85% hourly matching band, the 36-month additivity window, whether an energy reuse factor of 0.15 is reachable in the United States, the resident-majority composition of the advisory council, the 1% matched contribution level, tenant-level citation in colocation, and the 500 kW scope floor. Comments on those carry the most weight in this cycle.
Comment log
Every comment received is logged here. The first four entries are the convener's own, drawn from the public record before the draft was published, and are listed so that the source of each change is visible.
| Date | Commenter | Section | Summary | Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-05 | Convener, citing Lily Gangas (Kapor Foundation) at the Brookings CTI webinar, February 17, 2026 | Section 9; open question 8 | The draft had no treatment of end of life. Gangas: "how do you dispose of data centers... the whole life cycle." | Adopted. Decommissioning and site restoration plan with financial assurance, and continuity of fund contributions through closure, added as a condition of certification at Provisional tier and above. Open question 8 asks whether it should be scored instead. |
| 2026-09-05 | Convener, citing Supervisor Mike Turner (Loudoun County) at the same webinar | E3 | Electricity service agreements are proprietary and utilities now quote four to seven years to full power; a community cannot judge impact from a phase-one number. | Adopted. E3 now requires publication of the projected load ramp schedule to full build-out. |
| 2026-09-05 | Convener, citing Lily Gangas at the same webinar | W4, E3 | Proposed facilities should disclose expected water and power use 90 days in advance. | Adopted. W4 and E3 now require public disclosure of projected water demand and peak power demand at least 90 days before the first local approval hearing. |
| 2026-09-05 | Convener, citing Nicol Turner Lee (Brookings) at the same webinar | Pillar Four | Digital access belongs in any community benefit agreement; the draft's Pillar Four did not address it. | Adopted. New item C7 (2 points): the needs assessment evaluates broadband availability and affordability, digital access becomes an eligible fund priority where a gap exists, and the fiber route is assessed for public middle-mile use. C1 reduced to 5 and C3 to 7 to hold the pillar at 25. |
| 2026-09-05 | Convener, responding to the three audience questions on enforcement at the same webinar (51:21 to 57:14) | Pillar Four, C4 | Asked what enforcement of a community benefit agreement looks like, no panelist had a mechanism. The draft did not say how it related to executed agreements. | Adopted. Pillar Four now states that it assesses whether an agreement is being carried out, not how it was negotiated, and C4 requires quarterly reporting against every commitment in an executed agreement, with the agreement published. The scorecard is the enforcement mechanism: publication, annual re-audit, suspension for misstatement. |